ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
A critical review of the early clozapine trials published in German and a discussion of the many unresolved issues left by these trials.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clozapine was (1) first introduced in Austria and Switzerland in 1972, (2) associated with 8 Finnish deaths due to agranulocytosis in 1975 (almost leading to its withdrawal), and (3) approved in the United States (US) for treatment-resistant schizophrenia in 1989 (resulting in a worldwide resurrection). This article reviews the 1960s/1970s trials published in German that brought about the first approval of clozapine; they are not included in PubMed and received no attention in previous historical articles. Prior historical manuscripts and the references of identified articles provide us with 13 early trials published in German. The first was unsuccessful. Randomization, double-blindness, and control antipsychotic agents were used in 1 of 10 single-center trials and a multicenter trial. Most trials focused on schizophrenia. The efficacy of clozapine in (1) mania was proposed by Angst in the Swiss trials, and (2) aggression across psychiatric diagnoses by an Austrian trial. These trials did not discuss titrations; a study by Blum and Mauruschat focused on physiological changes and first identified fever in the absence of infection during clozapine titrations (called benign hyperthermia in the US). These limited early trials leading to the introduction of clozapine in the 1970s in German-speaking countries produced many unresolved issues. Our discussion reviews the most important aspects that were clarified but not completely resolved in later years, including (1) risk of agranulocytosis, (2) titration and dosing, and (3) indications. Further clarifications and advances are limited by the lack of funding, as clozapine is a generic drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42538420What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.