SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026
SAGES-EAES systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of FLIP/impedance planimetry in the surgical work-up and management of GERD, achalasia, and gastroparesis.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite adoption of functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) technology in foregut surgery, its diagnostic performance and clinical utility remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated FLIP in achalasia screening, anti-reflux surgery, myotomy, and gastroparesis to inform a clinical guideline from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was conducted through June 24, 2025, addressing four key questions (KQs): (1) preoperative FLIP versus high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) prior to anti-reflux surgery; (2A) intraoperative FLIP versus standard technique alone during anti-reflux surgery; (2B) intraoperative FLIP versus standard technique alone during myotomy; and (3) preoperative FLIP versus standard care alone before pylorus-directed therapy for gastroparesis. Comparative observational studies were included, and meta-analyses were performed when appropriate. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE; reporting followed PRISMA 2020.
resultsFor achalasia screening prior to anti-reflux surgery (KQ1), FLIP likely has high sensitivity (1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00) but may have low specificity (0.52; 95% CI, 0.38-0.66). Preoperative FLIP may improve patient comfort and reduce diagnostic interval. During anti-reflux surgery (KQ2A), intraoperative FLIP may result in little to no difference in dysphagia, reflux recurrence, gas bloating, or quality of life. During myotomy (KQ2B), intraoperative FLIP may increase symptom resolution (OR: 3.45 [95% CI: 1.09, 10.93]) with little to no difference in postoperative GERD or reoperation/revision. No comparative studies were identified for KQ3.
conclusionsFLIP may be a highly sensitive and well-tolerated screening tool for achalasia prior to anti-reflux surgery but may have low specificity, and evidence on long-term outcomes is limited. Intraoperative use may improve outcomes during myotomy but may offer limited benefit in anti-reflux surgery. Evidence for gastroparesis-related applications is insufficient. Overall CoE is low to very low, highlighting the need for rigorous, prospective comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42538398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.