Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538364›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2026

Impacts of pollution on the soil microbiome.

Yong-Guan Zhu, Dong Zhu, Qing-Lin Chen, Matthias C Rillig

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yong-Guan ZhuState Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. ygzhu@rcees.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3861-8482
Dong ZhuState Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-6423
Qing-Lin ChenState Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-277X
Matthias C RilligInstitute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-7853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microbiomes underpin terrestrial ecosystem functioning and drive nutrient cycling, plant productivity and ecological resilience. However, diverse pollutants, ranging from heavy metals and pesticides to plastics, perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and nanomaterials, are reshaping microbial communities in ways that threaten soil health and broader ecological stability. Thus, soils are hotspots of microbial evolution under chemical mixtures. Pollution alters microbial diversity, composition and functional capacity through mechanisms such as direct toxicity, shifts in soil chemistry and selective evolutionary pressures. These disruptions impair nutrient cycling, destabilize plant-microorganism interactions and accelerate the spread of antimicrobial resistance, with cascading effects on food webs and human health under a One Health framework. At the same time, soil microbiomes can serve as indicators of ecosystem stress and as tools for bioremediation and ecological restoration. This Review synthesizes current understanding of terrestrial pollution-microbiome interactions, highlights functional and health implications, and explores how microbiome-informed approaches can guide sustainable soil management and environmental protection under global change, while identifying key knowledge gaps and outlining future research directions for predictive and integrative microbiome-based solutions.

Identifiers

PMID42538364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.