Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538316›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026

Use of Coercion or Persuasion in Prehospital Treatment in the Region of Southern Denmark: A Retrospective Study.

Sif Højmark Vobbe, Henriette Bruun, Anne Craveiro Brøchner, Annmarie T Lassen, Tim Alex Lindskou, Torben Anders Kløjgård, Signe Wegmann Düring, Søren Mikkelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sif Højmark VobbePrehospital Research Unit, Prehospital EMS, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6690-7155
Henriette BruunPrehospital Research Unit, Prehospital EMS, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3955-269X
Anne Craveiro BrøchnerPrehospital Research Unit, Prehospital EMS, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6453-6152
Annmarie T LassenEmergency Medicine Research Unit, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-6152
Tim Alex LindskouCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-7859
Torben Anders KløjgårdCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Signe Wegmann DüringPsychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatry Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-3116
Søren MikkelsenPrehospital Research Unit, Prehospital EMS, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-7027

Funding

Region Syddanmark
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of coercion or persuasion raises ethical challenges but may be justified when prehospital patients require immediate treatment and are unable to consent. This study aims to describe the characteristics of coerced or persuaded adult pre-hospital patients in the Region of Southern Denmark.

methodsA descriptive analysis of ambulance contacts in the Region of Southern Denmark from January through June 2022. We identified all cases meeting the predefined inclusion criteria for coercion or persuasion, with or without police involvement. We classified cases into four categories: coercion (forced admission with police involvement), necessity or urgent need for treatment, persuasion with police involvement, and persuasion without police involvement. Additionally, we describe the study population's substance use, instances of self-harm, and the overall police involvement in managing these patients.

resultsWithin 39,021 prehospital patient contacts, 6743 cases indicated that coercion or persuasion could have occurred. In 416 cases (1.1% of all prehospital contacts), coercion or persuasion was confirmed. Of these, 65 patients were forcibly admitted to the hospital. Forty-six patients received non-patient-sanctioned treatment justified by necessity or an urgent need. Fifty patients were persuaded with police involvement, and 255 were persuaded through paternalistic means without police involvement. The median age of the coerced patients was 56 years; 54.8% being men. 26.9% of patients subjected to coercion were under the influence of substances. 17.8% of all coerced patients exhibited self-harming behaviours, such as attempting suicide, self-harm, or suicidal thoughts. The police were involved in 31.5% of cases of coercion.

conclusionCoercive measures or persuasion to consent were identified in a small proportion of prehospital contacts. When they occur, the most common form is persuasion without police involvement, but other forms of coercion are also observed. The study emphasises the need for greater attention to this issue to ensure the appropriate use of coercion and persuasion during emergencies. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This study presents experience from one region of Denmark with ambulance missions where the patient was uncooperative but needed acute medical care. Different approaches were commonly implemented in this circumstance, to try to minimise harm related to administering urgent or emergent care.

Indexed as

CoercionEmergency Medical ServicesPersuasive CommunicationAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoliceRetrospective Studiesambulancescoercionemergency medical servicesprehospitalpsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID42538316
PMCPMC13427635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.