ArticleBMJ open2026
Non-pharmacological interventions for lactational mastitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLactational mastitis is a common inflammatory condition that can adversely affect maternal well-being and is associated with early cessation of breastfeeding. Although antibiotics and analgesics are widely used in clinical practice, concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance and potential effects on the infant microbiome have prompted increasing interest in non-pharmacological approaches. A range of physical and biological interventions, including probiotics, therapeutic ultrasound, acupuncture and manual therapies, have been investigated; however, the comparative effectiveness and safety of these interventions remain unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for lactational mastitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We will systematically search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and SinoMed as well as relevant trial registries from database inception to March 2026.We will include randomised controlled trials enrolling adult lactating women diagnosed with mastitis. Eligible studies will compare non-pharmacological interventions with usual care, placebo or pharmacological treatments. Interventions involving pharmacologically active agents will be excluded.Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The primary outcome will be resolution of mastitis, defined as the return of body temperature to normal (<37°C) and resolution of localised breast symptoms (eg, pain, erythema and swelling). Secondary outcomes will include inflammatory markers (eg, C-reactive protein), pain intensity (measured using the Visual Analogue Scale or similar validated scales), incidence of adverse events, complete blood count parameters, time to symptom resolution or normalisation of body temperature, incidence of breast abscess and breastfeeding continuation rates.Meta-analysis will be conducted, where appropriate, using random-effects models. Continuous outcomes will be summarised using mean differences or standardised mean differences, and dichotomous outcomes using risk ratios, all with 95% CIs. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed using the ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this study as it is based on published data. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420261347640.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.