ArticleBMJ open2026
Having or losing a family physician: a protocol for a survey-based study of patient's continuity of primary care experience in Quebec, Canada.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionContinuity of care with a family physician (FP) is a core attribute of effective primary care and is associated with improved health outcomes, reduced service use and lower healthcare costs. In Canada, an ageing FP workforce has led to an increasing number of patients losing their FP, raising concerns about access to care and disruptions in care trajectories. While the benefits of continuity are well documented, evidence on the consequences of discontinuity in primary care, particularly from the patient perspective, remains limited. Relational discontinuity occurs when there is a disruption in the relationship between an FP and a patient, which may be related to the FP's retirement or relocation or to the closure of a clinic.
objectiveThis study aims to assess the effects of a disruption in the relational continuity with an FP on patient's experience and their patterns of healthcare service use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A descriptive cross-sectional survey will be administered to adults residing in Quebec, Canada's second most populous province. A total sample of 1000 respondents will be recruited, including approximately 500 individuals who have lost their FP within the past 3 years, and 500 individuals currently registered with an FP. The questionnaire covers sociodemographic characteristics, health status, access to care, use of healthcare services, out-of-pocket costs and perceived impacts of discontinuity. Descriptive and regression analyses will be used to compare experiences and perceived effects between groups and to explore equity-related differences. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Board involving human participants at Université Laval. Findings will be shared with policymakers and healthcare stakeholders to inform them on the patient-reported consequences of primary care discontinuity and support the development of strategies to mitigate its impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.