Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2026
A Multicenter Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: Conventional Dual Tracer Versus Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide.
Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe gold standard for detecting sentinel lymph node (SLN) in early breast cancer is combined use of radioisotope and blue dye. A newer agent, superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO), was developed to address the challenges faced with the traditional method. This study aims to compare the detection rate of SLN biopsy and show the non-inferiority of SPIO.
methodsFrom March 2021 to April 2024, patients with clinically and radiologically node-negative breast cancer were randomized to receive SPIO-only injection or dual tracer for SLN localization. The primary endpoint was the SLN identification rate in both arms.
results148 patients were in the SPIO group with 153 SLN procedures performed. SLN localization failed in one patient. The identification rate was 99.3% (95% CI: 95.8-99.9). 149 patients were in the dual tracer group with 156 SLN procedures done. The identification rate was 100% (95% CI: 97.0-99.9). The absolute difference was 0.7% (95% CI: -1.2 to 2.7).
conclusionOur results suggest that SPIO, as a single agent, used in SLN biopsy for early breast cancer is non-inferior to the dual tracer method. It can serve as a good alternative to radioactive isotope and blue dye.
trial registrationCUHK CREC Ref No. 2019.677-T (https://www.crec.cuhk.edu.hk/).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.