Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42537769›Full record

ArticleContraception2026

Comparing the TCu380A and a small Nova-T copper IUD: secondary analysis of discontinuation probabilities, bleeding outcomes and satisfaction in nulliparous participants from a 3-year randomized trial.

David Hubacher, Courtney A Schreiber, David K Turok, Stephanie B Teal, Anita L Nelson, Jeffrey T Jensen, Melissa J Chen, Kavita Nanda, Katharine O White, Ila Dayananda and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

David HubacherFHI 360, 359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701, United States. Electronic address: dhubacher@fhi360.org.
Courtney A SchreiberDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
David K TurokDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Stephanie B TealDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Anita L NelsonEssential Access Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jeffrey T JensenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Melissa J ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Kavita NandaFHI 360, 359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701, United States.
Katharine O WhiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Ila DayanandaPlanned Parenthood Greater New York, New York, NY, United States.
Pai-Lien ChenFHI 360, 359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701, United States.
Beatrice A ChenDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh and Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Alisa B GoldbergPlanned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, United States.
Jennifer L KernsDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Clint DartPremier Research, Morrisville, NC, United States.
Michael A ThomasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
David F ArcherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Jill E BrownDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Paula M CastañoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Anne E BurkeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Bliss KaneshiroDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Diana L BlitheContraceptive Development Program, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare discontinuation rates, satisfaction, and bleeding/pain outcomes over 3 years in a nulliparous population randomized to one of two copper IUDs. STUDY

designWe performed secondary analyses of the nulliparous population (n = 927) in a US-based, participant-blinded, randomized trial of the NTCu380-Mini (n = 744) and the TCu380A (n = 183). We calculated overall cumulative Kaplan-Meier IUD discontinuation and reason-specific probabilities by year. At nine timepoints over three years, participants summarized IUD satisfaction (highly satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, or highly dissatisfied) and last menstrual bleeding patterns; we analyzed responses over time using generalized linear models and estimating equations (computing odds ratios). On first-year diaries, participants also recorded bleeding and menstrual/intermenstrual pain.

resultsThrough one and two years, NTCu380-Mini users had lower overall discontinuation probabilities compared to TCu380A users: 24.8% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.03 and 39.6% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.02, respectively. Cumulative three-year rates were 50.1% (NTCu380-Mini) vs. 56.5% (TCu380A), p = 0.06. Through all intervals, NTCu380-Mini users had lower discontinuation rates due to bleeding and/or pain and lower expulsion rates relative to TCu380A users; cumulative three-years rate were 14.5% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001 and 10.0% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.03, respectively. Participants reported higher satisfaction with the NTCu380-Mini (OR 1.29 [95% CI 1.01-1.64]). In the first year, median number of bleeding/spotting days in a cycle (7.0) did not differ between products, yet some prolonged bleeding outcomes and type of pain showed product differences favoring the NTCu380-Mini.

conclusionOver 3 years, nulliparous NTCu380-Mini users had lower expulsion and discontinuation rates for bleeding and pain, and they reported higher satisfaction than TCu380A users. IMPLICATIONS: The NTCu380-Mini demonstrates comparative benefits in nulliparous users, with lower rates of early discontinuation due to pain and bleeding and expulsions. As copper IUDs are the only non-hormonal, long-acting reversible contraceptives available, future development should prioritize optimizing device design to minimize side effects while maintaining high contraceptive efficacy.

Indexed as

Bleeding diariesContinuationContraceptionExpulsionPainSide-effects

Identifiers

PMID42537769
PMCPMC13560460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.