ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026
Adaptation before and one year after liver transplantation: a longitudinal grounded theory study.
Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLiver transplant recipients undergo emotional, social and existential changes. Adaptation begins before surgery and continues long after discharge. However, no longitudinal grounded theory study has described this process across the transplantation trajectory. This study explored how individuals adapted by addressing their main concerns.
methodsTwelve adults (mean age 49.3 years, range 25-70) were interviewed pre- and post-transplantation. Data collection and analysis proceeded concurrently using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory and the constant comparative method.
resultsThe grounded theory conceptualised adaptation as striving for a life in social belonging. This process was explained through five interrelated categories: Comprehending, Accepting, Adapting, Coping and Balancing. Before transplantation, participants sought to maintain social belonging by preserving continuity in everyday life despite disruption, uncertainty and hope, reflecting existential concerns and conceptualised as optimising a disruptive situation. One year after transplantation, the process shifted from maintaining to reconstructing social belonging by rebuilding stability while managing vulnerability and ongoing uncertainty, reflecting existential concerns related to vulnerability and the future, conceptualised as managing an uncertain presence. Although the categories persisted across time, their meanings evolved throughout the transplantation trajectory.
conclusionAdaptation after liver transplantation involves creating a stable new normality, that accommodates uncertainty, gratitude, vulnerability and hope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.