ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Graph designs for deep learning-based multi-omics integration.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern sequencing technologies can now capture multiple omic layers from the same biological system, but integrating these views into a coherent model is far from trivial. Graph-based deep learning has become an attractive strategy because it can represent complex molecular interactions and sample relationships in a flexible way. In this review, we survey how graphs are constructed and used in multi-omics deep learning models, organizing methods by node schema, edge semantics, interaction type, integration strategy, graph context, and model architecture across bulk, single-cell, and spatial settings. We summarize the strengths and weaknesses of different design choices in terms of interpretability, data requirements, robustness to noise and missing modalities, and suitability for tasks ranging from prediction to mechanism-oriented discovery. Based on these insights, we outline a general, practical pipeline for constructing, curating, and evaluating graphs that can serve as a starting point for new multi-omics studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.