Trial reportJMIR formative research2026
Lucinactant, a Synthetic Surfactant for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Caused by COVID-19: Phase 1/2A Trial.
Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One unique feature of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is surfactant deficiency because SARS-CoV-2 specifically attacks alveolar type 2 cells. Objective: In this study, we evaluated the effects of a synthetic surfactant (lucinactant) therapy in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS. Methods: This open-label multicenter phase 1/2A trial enrolled adult patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS who were within 7 days of mechanical ventilation initiation. Lucinactant (160 mL or approximately 80 mg of total phospholipids per kilogram of lean body weight) was delivered intratracheally. One retreatment was allowed at ≥6-hour intervals. The primary end points were oxygenation index and PO2-to-fraction of inspired oxygen ratio up to day 5 after dosing. Other end points included time to deliver lucinactant and respiratory system compliance (Crs). We monitored peridosing events and adverse events up to 30 days after dosing. Results: A total of 19 treated patients were enrolled (n=14, 73.7% receiving 1 dose; n=5, 26.3% receiving 2 doses). The mean age was 49 (SD 15) years. The mean time to administer lucinactant was 31 minutes. No significant changes were observed in oxygenation index (mean 10.4, SD 5.8 at baseline; 8.6, SD 2.7 at 12 hours; and 5.7, SD 2.4 on day 5; P=.12 via ANOVA) or PO2-to-fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (mean 193, SD 69 at baseline; mean 179, SD 57 at 12 hours; and mean 223, SD 105 on day 5; P=.44 via ANOVA). Crs also did not change significantly (mean 40.7, SD 17.8 mL/H2O at baseline; mean 33.6, SD 8.5 mL/H2O at 12 hours; and mean 55.4, SD 18.5 mL/cmH2O on day 5; P=.12 via ANOVA). A total of 36.8% (n=7) of the participants died (6 from secondary infection and sepsis >13 days after dosing). In total, 15.8% (n=3) of the patients experienced transient peridosing desaturation or surfactant regurgitation. Conclusions: Our study showed that intratracheal instillation of 1 to 2 doses of lucinactant in COVID-19-associated ARDS was generally well tolerated. There were no significant changes in oxygenation parameters or Crs. The data suggest that, when future studies of lucinactant in patients with ARDS with severe surfactant dysfunction are conducted, an earlier and longer treatment protocol using different delivery methods that reach a larger alveolar surface area, such as aerosolization, may be needed to yield any beneficiary effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.