Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536919›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026

Machine Learning Frameworks for Wearable-Based Stress Modeling in Naturalistic Settings: Scoping Review.

Shifali Sharma, Aswin Kumar Janakiraman, Lujie Karen Chen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shifali SharmaDepartment of Information Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Cir, Baltimore, MD, United States, 1 412 657 5305.ORCID 0009-0007-5335-7942
Aswin Kumar JanakiramanDepartment of Information Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Cir, Baltimore, MD, United States, 1 412 657 5305.ORCID 0009-0000-6282-5102
Lujie Karen ChenDepartment of Information Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Cir, Baltimore, MD, United States, 1 412 657 5305.ORCID 0000-0002-7185-8405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stress, as commonly recognized, is an integral part of modern life and can significantly affect both mental and physical health. While substantial advancements have been made in measuring physical fitness through wearable devices, the detection and assessment of mental stress remain in their early stages. Objective: The objective of this paper is to review recent studies of wearable-based stress detection in naturalistic settings, with a specific focus on characterizing machine learning frameworks inspired by the model card approach. Methods: This review was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. A total of 353 articles were identified through searches in databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, IEEE, ACM Digital Library, Web of Science, and Embase. Studies were considered eligible if they collected data from healthy adults in naturalistic settings using wearable devices and used machine learning models for stress detection. Results: A total of 34 articles met the eligibility criteria, including 11 conference papers, 22 journal articles, and 1 preprint published between 2017 and 2024. From these studies, we analyzed key machine learning modeling decisions such as problem formulation, ground truth determination, and machine learning algorithms. Additionally, we examined the major contributions of each study, focusing on the challenges they addressed and the solutions they proposed. Based on these findings, we proposed a model card framework for reporting machine learning-based, wearable-based stress detection. Conclusions: This scoping review highlights recent trends in machine learning models for stress detection and measurement using wearable signals. It underscores the need for improved standardization in reporting practices for datasets and key machine learning decisions, as well as the importance of addressing critical challenges associated with data collection in real-world settings. We hope this review will support and strengthen ongoing research efforts, promote knowledge sharing, and promote collaboration among researchers-ultimately advancing the field as a community.

Indexed as

Machine LearningStress, PsychologicalWearable Electronic DevicesDigital HealthHumansfield studiesin the wildmachine learning modelsmental healthnaturalistic settingphysiologyscoping reviewstress detectionwearables

Identifiers

PMID42536919
PMCPMC13427063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.