Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536705›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Information, counseling and support needs of women with premature ovarian insufficiency: Qualitative findings from Germany.

Johanna Budke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Johanna BudkeInterdisciplinary Center for Gender Studies, Bielefeld University, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-8757-3871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundPremature ovarian insufficiency (POI) affects approximately 3,5-3,7% of women under 40 and is associated with significant physical, psychological, and social consequences. Despite international evidence indicating substantial unmet needs in diagnosis, information, and support, little is known about the situation of affected women in Germany.ObjectivesThis study aimed to explore the information, counseling, and support needs of women with POI within the German healthcare context.DesignA qualitative study design using episodic interviews was employed.MethodsEight women diagnosed with POI between the ages of 28 and 38 were recruited via online forums, social media groups, a gynecological practice, and personal networks. Interviews were conducted by telephone, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis with inductively developed categories.ResultsFour central themes emerged: (1) initial symptoms and diagnosis, (2) unmet information and counseling needs, (3) social support and barriers to open communication, and (4) challenges in the workplace. Participants described prolonged diagnostic pathways, insufficient medical sensitivity, and a lack of accessible, evidence-based information. Many sought information online or through peer networks due to inadequate professional guidance. Social support was identified as a key coping resource, while societal taboos surrounding menopause contributed to feelings of isolation. Workplace demands and expectations further exacerbated emotional and physical strain.ConclusionWomen with POI in Germany experience significant gaps in medical information, psychosocial support, and societal awareness. The findings underscore the importance of empathetic, patient-centered diagnostic processes, accessible information resources, and multiprofessional counseling services. Increasing public and workplace awareness is essential to reduce stigma and improve the quality of life for affected women.

Indexed as

CounselingHealth Services Needs and DemandPrimary Ovarian InsufficiencySocial SupportAdultFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Researchpatient focuspremature ovarian insufficiencyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42536705
PMCPMC13500986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.