Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536699›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Entering the new normal - psychosocial work environment and health during the transition from full remote to a hybrid work arrangement in a higher education context.

Jeffrey Casely-Hayford, Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg, Emmanuel Aboagye, Christina Björklund, Lydia Kwak, Susanna Toivanen, Gunnar Bergström, Irene Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeffrey Casely-HayfordUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6132-3274
Helena Tinnerholm LjungbergUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emmanuel AboagyeUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina BjörklundUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lydia KwakUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanna ToivanenDepartment of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Philosophy, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
Gunnar BergströmUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Irene JensenUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This longitudinal study explored the perceptions of psychosocial work factors, work-related health, and job satisfaction of 745 professional service staff, working in a higher education setting in Sweden, during the transition from full remote work to a hybrid work arrangement over 12-months. The study also explored whether these perceptions differed due to gender and household composition. The questionnaire data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with estimated marginal means and Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons. The results showed that while overall perceptions of psychosocial work factors showed modest changes during the transition, except for social support from colleagues, which significantly increased over time. Professional service staff reported higher levels of stress and exhaustion during the transition, while job satisfaction remained unchanged. The results also highlighted significant gender differences during the transition, as women reported less favourable perceptions of psychosocial work factors and higher levels of stress, while men's perceptions remained largely stable across these outcomes. Significant overall differences in household composition were also observed, as individuals living in single-person households and in single-parent households reported less favourable perceptions of psychosocial work factors and their work-related health compared to cohabitants and cohabitants with children, though all household groups followed similar trajectories during the transition. The findings suggest that higher education institutions should implement action plans for gender equality and family-supportive practices in hybrid work arrangements to ensure that the benefits of hybrid work are accessible to all employees.

Indexed as

WorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenWorking Conditions

Identifiers

PMID42536699
PMCPMC13426970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.