Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536671›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

NLCD: A method to discover nonlinear causal relations among genes.

Aravind Easwar, Manikandan Narayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aravind EaswarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras, Chennai, India.
Manikandan NarayananDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8490-4087

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinguishing correlation from causation is a fundamental challenge in many scientific fields, including biology, especially when interventions like randomized controlled trials are infeasible and only observational data are available. Methods based on statistical tests of conditional independence within the Mendelian Randomization framework can detect causality between two observed variables that are each associated with a third instrumental variable. However, these methods for detecting causal relationships between traits (e.g., two gene expression or clinical traits associated with a genetic variant, all observed in the same population) often assume a linear relationship, thereby hindering the discovery of causal gene networks from genomics data. We have developed NLCD, a method for NonLinear Causal Discovery from genomics data based on nonlinear regression modeling and conditional feature importance scoring. NLCD uses these techniques to extend the statistical tests in an existing linear causal discovery method called the Causal Inference Test (CIT). We benchmarked NLCD against current state-of-the-art methods: CIT, Findr, and MRPC. On simulated datasets, NLCD performs comparably to most methods in detecting linear relations (Average AUPRC (Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve) of NLCD = 0.94, CIT = 0.94, Findr = 0.94, and MRPC = 0.99), and outperforms them in detecting nonlinear (sine and sawtooth type) relations between two genes (Average AUPRC of NLCD = 0.76, CIT = 0.60, Findr = 0.56, and MRPC = 0.73). When tested on a nonlinear subset of a yeast genomic dataset to recover known causal relations involving transcription factors, NLCD and CIT performed comparable to each other and slightly better than Findr and MRPC (Average AUPRC of NLCD = 0.82, CIT = 0.81, Findr = 0.71, and MRPC = 0.54). On application to a human genomic dataset, NLCD revealed active causal gene pairs (IRF1 → PSME1 and HLA-C → HLA-T) in the muscle tissue, and clarified the promises and challenges in discovering causal gene networks in tissues under in vivo human settings.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsAlgorithmsCausalityComputer SimulationHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisModels, GeneticNonlinear DynamicsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID42536671
PMCPMC13450862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.