ArticlePloS one2026
Reproducibility of fetal global longitudinal strain measured with speckle tracking echocardiography using a fixed cardiac cycle.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal speckle tracking echocardiography is an ultrasound-based technique used to assess myocardial velocity and deformation of the fetal heart. Despite its potential, the method has not yet been integrated into routine pregnancy care, partly due to concerns about inconsistent reproducibility. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of global longitudinal strain measurements derived from a fixed fetal cardiac cycle, using speckle tracking echocardiography. Healthy women with singleton pregnancies were enrolled during the second trimester. From enrolment until delivery, four-chamber view clips of the fetal heart were acquired every four weeks. For intra-observer reproducibility, a single observer analyzed the same heart cycle in one DICOM clip twice for global longitudinal strain in the left and right ventricles, with a minimum interval of two weeks between assessments in a blinded manner. For inter-observer reproducibility, two independent observers analyzed the same cardiac cycle within one DICOM clip. A total of 124 women were included, yielding 632 ultrasound clips. Intra-observer reproducibility was poor to moderate for global longitudinal strain for the right and left ventricles. Inter-observer reproducibility demonstrated moderate to good reproducibility for global longitudinal strain in both ventricles. The reproducibility was generally higher in the left ventricle than in the right, and the highest reproducibility was observed before 32 weeks of gestation. In conclusion, speckle tracking echocardiography during pregnancy showed variable reproducibility of strain analysis when performed on a fixed cardiac cycle, with more consistent results in the left ventricle. These findings support the potential utility of fetal speckle tracking echocardiography, while highlighting the need for further refinement of reproducibility before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.