ArticleMedicine2026
Performance-based activities of daily living using the Londrina ADL protocol in non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective cross-sectional controlled study: Performance-based ADL in NSCLC.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective assessment of activities of daily living (ADL) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains limited despite its clinical importance. The Londrina ADL protocol enables standardized evaluation of real-life functional performance. This study aimed to evaluate performance-based ADL in NSCLC and identify determinants of impaired ADL performance. In this prospective cross-sectional controlled study, 23 NSCLC patients who had completed adjuvant treatment and 27 healthy controls underwent pulmonary function testing, muscle strength assessment, a 6-minute walk test (6MWD), quality-of-life evaluation, and Londrina ADL testing. Group comparisons, correlations, and multivariable linear regression were performed. Performance-based ADL is markedly impaired in NSCLC, and reduced exercise capacity is the principal determinant of real-life functional limitation. Objective ADL assessment may support early, capacity-targeted rehabilitation to preserve independence. NSCLC patients showed significantly longer Londrina ADL completion times than controls (335.6 ± 63.7 s vs 270.7 ± 34.4 s; P < .001) with reduced pulmonary function, muscle strength, and exercise capacity. Within NSCLC, ADL time correlated inversely with 6MWD (r = -0.579, P = .004). Functional exercise capacity was the only independent predictor of ADL performance (β = -0.498, P = .022), and the model explained 36.1% of the variance in Londrina ADL completion time (R2 = 0.361).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.