ArticleMedicine2026
Characterization of mandibular third molar impaction patterns and a CBCT-derived radiographic extraction difficulty in a Saudi cohort: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mandibular third molar (MTM) impaction is the most frequent type of impacted tooth. Therefore, we aimed to report cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based MTM impaction patterns in a Saudi cohort and to investigate the relationship between these patterns and a CBCT-derived radiographic extraction difficulty. This retrospective cross-sectional study screened 200 consecutive archived CBCT scans (May-October 2025) from King Khalid University Dental Hospital. Sixty-nine patients who had 1 or more impacted MTMs were analyzed and met the eligibility criteria. Impaction type (bony/partial), angulation of Winter (vertical/mesioangular/horizontal/distoangular), and the orientation of the buccolingual crown were measured. The elevator fulcrum-based depth surrogate was used to assess radiographic difficulty (mild/moderate/high) against the distal thirds of the roots of the second molar beside it. Among screened CBCTs, 69/200 (34.5%; 95% confidence interval: 28.3-41.3) demonstrated ≥1 impacted MTM. Within the analyzed cohort (n = 69), mesioangular angulation was the most frequent. Winter's angulation was associated with radiographic difficulty on the right side (χ2 = 27.85, df = 6, P = .0001; Holm-adjusted P = .0004) but not on the left after adjustment (χ2 = 13.54, df = 6, P = .035; Holm-adjusted P = .070). Buccolingual orientation was associated with radiographic difficulty on the right (χ2 = 23.80, df = 10, P = .008; Holm-adjusted P = .025) but not on the left (χ2 = 3.84, df = 8, P = .872). The metric of MTM angulation and the buccolingual orientation were found to be side-dependent, related to a CBCT-based radiographic difficulty grade. Since difficulty was measured radiographically (not relative to operative outcomes) and the impacted-case sample was modest, findings need to be taken with caution and confirmed prospectively using surgical time, complications, and patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.