ArticleMedicine2026
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting hemoptysis risk in patients with bronchiectasis: A study based on Random Forest algorithm.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemoptysis is a severe and potentially life-threatening complication of bronchiectasis. There is currently a lack of reliable tools for the individualized prediction of hemoptysis risk in these patients. This study aimed to utilize a machine learning algorithm to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the risk of hemoptysis in patients with bronchiectasis. This retrospective study enrolled 131 patients with bronchiectasis, who were randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set in a 7:3 ratio. The Random Forest algorithm was employed, using mean decrease accuracy as the metric, to screen for important predictors from clinical variables. Subsequently, the selected variables were incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression model to construct the predictive nomogram. The model's discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were comprehensively evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curve. The top 10 important predictors identified by the Random Forest algorithm included body mass index, C-reactive protein, creatinine, age, urea, low-density lipoprotein, platelet count, total cholesterol, diabetes, and fasting plasma glucose. Multivariate logistic analysis confirmed that body mass index, C-reactive protein, creatinine, age, and urea were independent predictors of hemoptysis. After correcting the mismatched logistic regression parameters, the constructed nomogram still demonstrated excellent predictive performance in both the training and validation sets, with an area under the curve of 0.944 (95% confidence interval: 0.873-1.000) in the validation set. The calibration curve showed a high degree of consistency between predicted probabilities and observed outcomes. Decision curve analysis and the clinical impact curve further confirmed that the model provided significant net clinical benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. This study successfully developed and validated a nomogram that incorporates Random Forest-based variable screening. The model integrates 5 readily available clinical parameters to accurately and individually predict the risk of hemoptysis in patients with bronchiectasis, demonstrating good calibration and clinical utility. It serves as a valuable tool to assist clinicians in the early identification and management of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.