ArticleMedicine2026
A novel plate design for anatomic reduction of posterior acetabular column and wall fractures: A retrospective comparative study of the Paseos plate versus the pelvic reconstruction plate.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study endeavors to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of 2 different types of plate fixation for posterior acetabular wall and/or column fractures, transverse and posterior wall fractures. We designed an anatomical plate that is easy to apply for acetabular posterior wall and column fractures and can simultaneously fix the column and wall as support with the buttressing effect. Weight-bearing and bending biomechanical tests were performed for the development of the plate. The 39 acetabular fractures operated between January 2013 and June 2017 were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 17) received treatment using the Paseos anatomical plate, while Group 2 (n = 22) with conventional reconstruction plates. Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score and Matta reduction criteria were utilized for the functional and radiological evaluations. According to Matta reduction criteria, in Group 1, anatomical reduction was achieved in 14 patients (82.3%), good reduction in 2 patients (11.7%), and poor reduction in 1 patient (5.9%). In Group 2, anatomical reduction was observed in 19 patients (86.4%), good reduction in 2 patients (9.1%), and poor reduction in 1 patient (4.5%). At the 12-month follow-up, functional outcomes were evaluated using Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scoring system. In Group 1, excellent scores were recorded in 13 patients (76.4%), good scores in 3 patients (17.6%), and fair scores in 1 patient (5.9%). In Group 2, excellent scores were observed in 19 patients (86.4%), good scores in 2 patients (9.1%), and fair scores in 1 patient (4.5%). The median operation duration in Group 1 was significantly lower than Group 2 (P < .001). Paseos plate demonstrated clinical and radiological outcomes comparable to conventional reconstruction plates. Due to its special anatomical structure, it can support a wide bony area with its buttress effect and also it can be applied directly without the need for reshaping during surgery, thus shortening the surgical duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.