SynthesisMedicine2026
Efficacy of azithromycin sequential therapy combined with montelukast in the treatment of pediatric mycoplasma pneumonia: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) stands as a predominant cause of community-acquired respiratory infections in children. With the increasing prevalence of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains, the therapeutic efficacy of azithromycin monotherapy has become a growing concern in clinical practice. Montelukast sodium, a selective leukotriene receptor antagonist, has emerged as a promising adjunctive agent, as it can effectively alleviate airway inflammation and reduce airway hyperresponsiveness. This meta-analysis was designed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of azithromycin sequential therapy combined with montelukast in the management of pediatric MPP.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Wanfang Data, Variant Impact Predictor database, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from the establishment of each database up to November 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared azithromycin sequential monotherapy with azithromycin sequential therapy plus montelukast in pediatric patients diagnosed with MPP. Primary outcome measures included overall clinical efficacy, resolution time of key clinical symptoms (cough, wheezing, pulmonary rales, and fever), and the incidence of adverse events.
resultsThirty-six RCTs involving 3450 pediatric patients (1726 in the combination group and 1724 in the azithromycin group) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with azithromycin sequential therapy, combination therapy significantly improved overall clinical efficacy (odds ratio = 4.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.70-6.10). The addition of montelukast also shortened the resolution time of cough (mean difference [MD] = -3.63, 95% CI: -4.27 to -2.99), wheezing (MD = -1.48, 95% CI: -1.82 to -1.14), pulmonary rales (MD = -2.06, 95% CI: -2.54 to -1.57), and fever (MD = -1.43, 95% CI: -1.89 to -0.96). No significant difference in adverse event rates was observed between groups.
conclusionsAzithromycin sequential therapy combined with montelukast may provide additional therapeutic benefits for the treatment of pediatric MPP, characterized by higher overall clinical efficacy and more rapid resolution of clinical symptoms, without a statistically significant increase in short-term adverse events. Despite the encouraging findings, the included studies were predominantly single-center trials with moderate methodological quality. Therefore, well-designed, large-scale, multicenter RCTs are urgently needed to validate these results and provide more reliable evidence for guiding clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.