ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
A module-based approach for post-omics, post-GWAS network-based gene classification.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationComplex traits and diseases are highly polygenic and understanding the full set of genes involved is a central challenge in biomedicine. However, due to sample size limitations and noise (technical and biological), experimental approaches for disease-gene discovery such as transcriptomics and GWAS result in long, noisy, heterogeneous gene lists, which may be trimmed to a subset of likely relevant genes while leaving several false negatives. Computational gene classification approaches, especially those using genome-scale molecular interaction networks, are promising avenues for complementing such experimental findings by analytically expanding observed gene lists based on the functional relatedness between genes. We previously introduced the network-based gene classification approach, GenePlexus, which was rigorously benchmarked to show state-of-the-art performance, especially for predicting novel genes associated with biological processes and fine-grained phenotypes. Network-based gene classification performance,however, declines for diseases, especially when the inputs are omics and GWAS-based long gene lists.
resultsHere, we show that these disease gene lists span multiple biological processes spread across the molecular network, and we propose ModGenePlexus, a new network-based gene classification method that takes a two-stage approach. First, clustering and semi-supervised learning decomposes the input gene list into coherent, denoised network gene modules. Then, ModGenePlexus trains supervised (GenePlexus) classifiers for each module and aggregates predictions to return genome-wide rankings. We benchmarked ModGenePlexus across simulated data, transcriptomic signatures, and GWAS datasets (together spanning hundreds of diseases), showing improved recovery of known disease genes compared to GenePlexus. Beyond improved classification, the results of enrichment analysis of ModGenePlexus outputs are much more interpretable by virtue of revealing nuanced biological processes. Together, these results establish ModGenePlexus as a scalable, interpretable tool for gene classification of GWAS- and omics-derived gene lists across diverse biological contexts. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ModGenePlexus is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/krishnanlab/ModGenePlexus, and the full source code and results supporting this study are available on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/records/19857910.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.