ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Accelerating inference in genomic and proteomic foundation models via speculative decoding.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGenomic and protein foundation models (GFMs and PFMs) have demonstrated strong performance in learning the language of DNA and proteins, but their use in large-scale sequence generation is limited by the latency of autoregressive decoding. Because every token triggers a forward pass of a large Transformer, whose inference is relatively slow, long-sequence generation quickly becomes costly.
resultsIn this work we adapt speculative decoding to a representative GFM: the DNA model DNAGPT and two representative PFMs: ProGen2 and ProtGPT2. We implement a probabilistic variant of speculative decoding, in which a lightweight draft model proposes short token spans and a larger target model verifies or corrects them in parallel, while preserving the target model's sampling distribution. Across all three models we systematically study the effect of speculation window length, temperature, draft architecture and prompt length, and we benchmark tokens per second over multiple runs per configuration. Speculative decoding yields consistent speedups over standard key-value cached decoding, with maximum observed speedup reaching 100% increase, while average gains across models ranging between 20% and 40% (e.g. 1.2×-1.4×), without changing the underlying target model predictions. Our results show that speculative decoding is a practical and model-agnostic strategy for accelerating genomic and proteomic sequence generation without sacrificing prediction quality. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code and results are freely available at https://github.com/Georgakopoulos-Soares-lab/BioSpecDec.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.