ArticleJAMA health forum2026
Trends and Factors in Nursing Home Closures.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: US nursing home closures, whether planned or unexpected, can disrupt continuity of care, place additional burdens on remaining facilities, and disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. It is important to understand the trends and factors associated with these closures, as such knowledge can inform policy decisions, guide resource allocation, and help develop strategies to mitigate negative effects on both residents and the broader health care system. Objective: To examine nursing home operational dynamics in the US and to identify how facilities transition through openings, closures, and changes of ownership (CHOW). Design, Setting, and Participants: A longitudinal cohort study used 40 years of data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Provider of Services File, covering the period from 1985 through June 2025. Facility trajectories were examined using physical location identifiers rather than facility names or provider identifiers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Facility lifecycle status (active, closed, or reopened), CHOW events, net changes in certified bed capacity, facility size, availability of specialized beds for patients with dementia, Medicare and Medicaid participation, and staffing intensity were assessed. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze trends and differences between closed and active facilities. Results: A total of 39 449 records were analyzed, representing 33 110 unique physical locations and 80 257 event records. Nearly half of all entities followed an entry-exit trajectory without any CHOW, accounting for 46.29% (n = 15 328). A substantial proportion of entities remained active while experiencing at least 1 CHOW (20.48% [n = 6780]). CHOW events accounted for 13 053 occurrences (16.26%) of lifecycle activity, and capacity changes were increasingly concentrated in recent years in select states. Overall, organizational restructuring and within-facility capacity adjustment became more prominent over time than entry or exit. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that nursing home markets were characterized by continuous organizational change, with ownership transitions and capacity reconfiguration increasingly substituting for entry and exit. Examining the location-based life cycle of the facility shows that closure often reflects restructuring within evolving ownership structures rather than a single terminal event. These findings suggest that nursing home policy and oversight should attend to ownership transitions and capacity reconfiguration, alongside measures of facility entry and exit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.