Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536373›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Guns and Perceptions of Safety Among US Women.

Cassandra K Crifasi, Elizabeth Wagner, Rebecca Valek, Vanya C Jones, Julie A Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cassandra K CrifasiCenter for Gun Violence Solutions, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth WagnerCenter for Gun Violence Solutions, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Rebecca ValekOregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland.
Vanya C JonesCenter for Gun Violence Solutions, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Julie A WardDepartment of Medicine, Health, and Society, College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prior research found differences in the perceived safety benefits from firearm exposure among diverse gun owners. More women have bought firearms in recent years, resulting in a growing proportion of women who own guns. Objective: To examine differences in perceptions of safety among US women, including women who personally own firearms. Design, Setting, and Participants: This descriptive survey study used data from the nationally representative National Survey of Gun Policy, fielded January 6 to 24, 2025. Participants included members of the AmeriSpeak panel who were invited to, and completed, the survey (survey completion rate, 69.8%; N = 2977) online or by telephone in English or Spanish. This study focused specifically on women respondents. Exposures: Women respondents were stratified by whether they personally owned a gun, lived in a home with a gun that did not belong to them, or had no guns in the home. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was differences in respondents affirming whether "personally owning a gun will make me safer" and "I would feel safer if more people were allowed to legally carry guns." These perceptions were also examined across racial and ethnic subgroups of gun-owning women and by whether protection in or out of the home were important reasons for ownership. Differences were assessed using survey-weighted logistic regression models. Results: A total of 1411 women completed the survey. The mean (SE) age of women respondents was 48.4 (0.6) years; 12.8% self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, 17.4% as Hispanic, 60.3% as non-Hispanic White, and 9.5% as non-Hispanic other race. Overall, 41.1% (95% CI, 37.7%-44.4%) of women affirmed that personally owning a gun would make them safer, and 21.3% (95% CI, 18.5%-24.0%) agreed they would feel safer if more people were allowed to legally carry guns. Affirmations were significantly higher among gun-owning women (69.7% [95% CI, 63.0%-76.3%] and 35.3% [95% CI, 28.6%-42.0%], respectively), compared with those living in homes with guns (48.9% [95% CI, 40.6%-57.1%] and 22.2% [95% CI, 15.1%-29.3%]) and gun-free homes (26.0% [95% CI, 22.5%-29.6%] and 14.8% [95% CI, 11.9%-17.8%]). Among gun owners, agreement with perceived safety gains from ownership ranged from 63.2% (95% CI, 36.7%-89.8%) among non-Hispanic other to 72.6% (95% CI, 56.1%-89.1%) among Hispanic respondents, and perceived safety from others carrying from 20.1% (95% CI, 9.4%-30.9%) among Black to 40.5% (95% CI, 13.4%-67.6%) among non-Hispanic other respondents, with no significant differences by racial and ethnic groups. There were no significant differences when comparing those who did vs did not report that protection in the home or out of the home were important reasons for ownership. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of US women, more than half of overall respondents perceived they would not feel safer with greater exposure to firearms, although results varied by personal gun ownership. As gun ownership diversifies, these findings highlight the importance of attending to perceptions of safety in discussions of interventions to reduce gun violence.

Indexed as

FirearmsOwnershipPerceptionSafetyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42536373
PMCPMC13428276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.