ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Perceived learning curve of the nursing team using the da vinci XI surgical system in a Brazilian university hospital.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This qualitative exploratory study evaluated 25 nursing team members experienced in Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) at a Brazilian university hospital. Data collection used a validated instrument (CVI = 1.0), and Bardin's thematic analysis identified three competency domains: clinical practice/system configuration, management of inputs/logistics, and handling of complications/learning curve indicators. Participants were predominantly female (88%), averaging three years of RAS experience with high heterogeneity (CV ≈ 68%). All participants performed patient positioning and endoscope connection; 92% managed electrosurgical settings; and 80% handled decoupling and pre-cleaning. Basic system proficiency required a weighted average of 16 procedures, whereas safe intraoperative performance required 13.5 weeks of immersion. Emergency undocking was reported by 28% of participants, primarily caused by power failures or system instability. The perceived learning curve was non-linear and dependent on procedure frequency, specialty complexity, and institutional support. In conclusion, the learning curve is multidimensional and cannot be reduced to single targets. Brazilian nursing teams operate beyond formal regulatory boundaries, highlighting the need for competency-based training, specialty exposure, and emergency simulation protocols. The gap between perceived proficiency and objective thresholds shows self-reported learning reflects operational familiarity rather than complete clinical safety. Standardizing emergency undocking preparedness remains an essential patient safety priority. These findings establish a baseline for standardized nursing RAS training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.