ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
A lightweight method for regression-based normalization of the cross-sectional area for cervical spinal cord atrophy assessment.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the cervical spinal cord (CSC) is a key biomarker for monitoring neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its clinical utility is limited by inter-subject variability (I-SV) due to anthropometric factors (height, sex) and MRI scanner differences, which can obscure true anatomical changes. This motivates the development of a normalization strategy to enhance the sensitivity of this established biomarker to pathological changes. Existing normalization methods rely on complex imaging features unavailable in many clinical datasets, thereby motivating the need for simpler approaches. We propose a lightweight regression-based normalization model for CSC-CSA using routinely available predictors. We evaluated the effect of these predictors across cervical spinal levels (CSL), demonstrating that the model captures a quantifiable proportion of I-SV reflected by a 15-23% reduction in the coefficient of variation (COV). Prior to normalization, CSC-CSA is measured using a novel fully automated landmark-based method. It is independent of vertebral labeling and spinal curvature, and uses spinal nerve midpoints as anatomical references. Model development was conducted using 267 healthy controls (HC) from the Spine Generic dataset. For validation, two external datasets were used: the public OpenNeuro dataset, comprising 10 HC, and a private dataset consisting of 23 scans acquired from 5 patients with MS. Bidirectional stepwise regression per CSL yielded adjusted [Formula: see text] of 0.09-0.17. This approach offers a practical, generalizable framework for normalizing CSC-CSA, enabling accurate cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses in MS cohorts, as well as quantifying atrophy linked to progressive MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536339What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.