ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Efficacy and safety of leflunomide with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe clinical benefit of combining leflunomide (LEF) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and treatment durability of LEF-TNFi compared with non-LEF regimens (predominantly methotrexate (MTX)-TNFi and TNFi monotherapy).
methodsThis retrospective cohort included 492 biologic-naive PsA patients initiating TNFi (2003-2020): LEF-TNFi (n = 85) versus non-LEF (n = 407). Multiple imputation addressed missing data, and propensity score matching (7 covariates; caliper 0.2 standard deviations of the logit-propensity score) addressed confounding by indication. Longitudinal outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models; treatment modification was evaluated via Cox models. Reasons for treatment modification were examined descriptively using a competing risks framework.
resultsSubstantial baseline imbalances (23 of 36 variables with standardized mean difference > 0.10) were eliminated by propensity score matching (0 of 7 matching covariates with SMD > 0.10; 96.9% of LEF patients retained). Post-adjustment, longitudinal disease activity trajectories did not differ significantly between groups (time-by-treatment interactions: Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), p = 0.862; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), p = 0.308). Overall treatment modification rates were similar (propensity score-matched hazard ratio (HR) = 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53-2.51; p = 0.709). Descriptively, LEF patients were more frequently subject to treatment modification for remission (10.6% vs. 5.9%) and less frequently for inefficacy (5.9% vs. 11.1%), although cause-specific hazard ratios did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionAfter propensity score adjustment, LEF-TNFi showed no detectable difference in disease activity trajectories or overall treatment persistence compared with MTX-TNFi and TNFi monotherapy. However, LEF-TNFi modifications were predominantly driven by achieved remission rather than inefficacy. Keypoints • Propensity score-adjusted analyses revealed no detectable difference in disease activity trajectories between the LEF-TNFi, MTX-TNFi, and TNFi monotherapy groups in psoriatic arthritis. • Competing risks analysis showed that LEF modifications were driven by remission rather than inefficacy, a clinical distinction obscured by standard composite endpoints. • These hypothesis-generating findings suggest that LEF may be a viable alternative to MTX as concomitant csDMARD therapy with TNFi in PsA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.