Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536322›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2026

Incident Neutropenia in New Users of Different Non-opioid Analgesics: An Observational Propensity Score-Controlled Cohort Study.

Stephan Gut, Marlene Rauch, Jan Gaertner, Susan S Jick, Christoph R Meier, Julia Spoendlin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephan GutBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 26, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7292-3101
Marlene RauchBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 26, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8985-654X
Jan GaertnerCenter of Palliative Care, Bethesda Spital AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-3164
Susan S JickBoston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Lexington, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2215-1067
Christoph R MeierBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 26, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. christoph.meier@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7120-6378
Julia SpoendlinBasel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 26, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-1928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol have been associated with neutropenia and agranulocytosis with inconsistent results.

objectiveTo investigate the risk of neutropenia in association with frequently used NSAIDs compared to paracetamol.

methodsWe conducted a cohort study using the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD. In three pairwise comparisons, we compared the risk of neutropenia including agranulocytosis (defined by Read codes) between new NSAID users (diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen) and new paracetamol users (active comparator) during a maximum follow up of 60 days. Secondary and tertiary outcomes additionally included (1) in-patient diagnosed agranulocytosis and (2) laboratory values indicating neutropenia. Both were additionally restricted to only agranulocytosis. We applied propensity score-fine stratification to control for measured confounding and quantified incidence rates (IRs) as well as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsOur weighted cohorts included 1,003,314 (paracetamol) to 2,207,612 (diclofenac) patients. Weighted IRs of neutropenia (primary outcome) were between 2.1/10,000 person years (PYs) and 2.3/10,000 PYs. HRs for the primary outcome ranged between 1.00 (95% CI 0.51-1.94) and 1.12 (95% CI 0.57-2.23) for NSAIDs versus paracetamol. The secondary and tertiary outcome yielded reduced HRs between 0.53 and 1.03, and even lower HRs when restricted to agranulocytosis (HR between 0.19 and 0.51).

conclusionOur results indicate no risk of neutropenia for NSAIDs when compared to paracetamol. An increased risk of agranulocytosis in association with paracetamol is possible, but residual confounding by frailty may at least partially explain this association.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.