Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536308›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Radiomics and machine learning analysis of ultrasound images in Bethesda IV thyroid nodules: a retrospective monocentric study.

Alessandro Pinna, Matteo Baire, Gian Luigi Canu, Federico Cappellacci, Elisa Boninu, Agnese Piras, Alessandro Fanti, Luca Saba, Pietro Giorgio Calò, Fabio Medas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alessandro PinnaDepartment of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, 09124, Italy.
Matteo BaireDipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica ed Elettronica, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, Cagliari, Italy.
Gian Luigi CanuDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Federico CappellacciDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Elisa BoninuDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Agnese PirasDipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica ed Elettronica, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, Cagliari, Italy.
Alessandro FantiDipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica ed Elettronica, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, Cagliari, Italy.
Luca SabaDepartment of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, 09124, Italy.
Pietro Giorgio CalòDepartment of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, 09124, Italy.
Fabio MedasDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. fabiomedas@unica.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-0178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bethesda IV thyroid nodules remain a major diagnostic challenge because cytology cannot reliably distinguish benign from malignant follicular-patterned lesions, often leading to diagnostic surgery for ultimately benign disease. This study evaluated whether ultrasound radiomics combined with machine learning could improve preoperative risk stratification in this setting. We conducted a retrospective monocentric study including 69 surgically treated patients with Bethesda IV thyroid nodules and definitive histopathology. Ultrasound images acquired between 2019 and 2020 were manually segmented, and radiomic features were extracted using LIFEx software. After preprocessing and removal of non-informative features, the dataset was split into training (n = 48) and a held-out test set (n = 21), isolated prior to any modelling procedure. Dimensionality reduction was performed with principal component analysis analysis (20 components, 99.5% explained variance). Three supervised machine-learning models were developed and compared: K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Internal validation was performed by leave-one-out cross-validation on the training set, with StandardScaler and PCA fitted inside each fold. Final performance was assessed once on the held-out test set. All metrics are reported with 95% confidence intervals. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation and leave-one-out cross-validation, with evaluation of accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC. Final histology showed malignancy in 39/69 nodules (56.5%). On the held-out test set, RF (n = 50 estimators, depth = 10) achieved the best overall performance: AUC 0.735 (95% CI 0.513-0.956), sensitivity 0.714 (95% CI 0.454-0.883), specificity 0.571 (95% CI 0.250-0.842), and accuracy 0.667 (95% CI 0.454-0.828). KNN (k = 3) achieved AUC 0.602 (95% CI 0.359-0.845). XGBoost did not generalise to the test set (AUC 0.378, 95% CI 0.094-0.661). Leave-one-out cross-validation estimates were modest across all models (AUC range 0.397-0.588), with confidence intervals overlapping 0.50, reflecting the limited statistical power of the training set at n = 48. Ultrasound radiomics combined with Random Forest shows preliminary discriminative ability for distinguishing benign from malignant Bethesda IV thyroid nodules. The wide confidence intervals observed highlight the need for a larger prospective validation cohort. These findings establish a methodological framework and provide sample size benchmarks for a powered confirmatory study.

Indexed as

Bethesda IVIndeterminate thyroid nodulesRadiomicsThyroidectomyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42536308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.