ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Applicability of trichoscopy in forensic medicine.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hair is a resilient forensic element capable of preserving morphological and biochemical information and may provide relevant evidence in cases of mechanical violence involving forcible traction or avulsion. This report describes the application of trichoscopy as a complementary tool in forensic medicine for the evaluation and documentation of traumatic hair-pulling injuries. A 66-year-old woman underwent forensic medical examination after reporting a single episode of hair traction injury resulting from interpersonal violence. Clinical assessment was performed, followed by trichoscopic examination of the affected scalp area to document hair shaft and follicular alterations. Trichoscopy revealed short terminal hairs of varying lengths, black dots, yellow dots, and the presence of vellus hairs. Petechial haemorrhages were not observed, probably due to the four-week interval between the traumatic event and forensic examination. The findings were compatible with post-traumatic alopecia after forcible traction. This case suggests that trichoscopy may represent a useful, painless, non-invasive, and reproducible complementary method for the objective documentation of traumatic scalp injuries, allowing digital image recording and highlighting its potential role as an auxiliary tool in forensic medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.