ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Space allowance modulates behavioural patterns and coccidial burden in Sirohi goat kids.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of different space allowances on the behaviour and coccidial load in intensively reared Sirohi goat kids. Seventy-two healthy Sirohi goat kids (approximately three months of age) with similar initial body weights were randomly allocated to four space allowance treatments: 0.8 m²/kid (T1), 0.9 m²/kid (T2), 0.7 m²/kid (T3), and 0.6 m²/kid (T4), with three replicate pens of six kids each. Daily behavioural observations were conducted over 90 days using scan sampling, and faecal samples were collected on Days 0, 30, 60, and 90 to measure coccidial oocyst counts (OPG). Results showed that space allowance significantly affected behavioural responses and coccidial burden (p < 0.05). Kids in lower space allowances (0.6 and 0.7 m²/kid) exhibited more feeding, standing, drinking, and agonistic behaviours, while resting, locomotor activity, self-grooming, and affiliative interactions decreased compared to those in higher allowances (0.8 and 0.9 m²/kid). Stereotypic and eliminative behaviours were not significantly affected (p > 0.05). Coccidial burden increased over the experimental period, being highest in kids at 0.6 m²/kid (T4) and lowest in those at 0.9 m²/kid (T2). These findings suggest that providing adequate space allowance can improve behavioural welfare and reduce coccidial burden in intensively reared Sirohi goat kids, highlighting the importance of appropriate housing management in intensive production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.