ArticleLifetime data analysis2026
Causal effect on the number of life years lost due to a specific event: average treatment effect and variable importance.
Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Competing risk is a common phenomenon when dealing with time-to-event outcomes in biostatistical applications. An attractive estimand in this setting is the "number of life-years lost due to a specific cause of death". It provides a direct interpretation on the time-scale on which the data is observed. In this paper, we introduce the causal effect on the number of life years lost due to a specific event and give assumptions under which the average treatment effect (ATE) and the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) are identified from the observed data. Semiparametric estimators for the ATE and a partially linear projection of CATE, serving as a variable importance measure, are proposed. These estimators leverage machine learning for nuisance parameters and are model-agnostic, asymptotically normal, and efficient. We give conditions under which the estimators are asymptotically normal, and their performance is investigated in a simulation study. Lastly, the methods are implemented in a study concerning the response to different antidepressants using data from the Danish national registers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.