Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536235›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2026

Constructing a Conceptual Model for Measuring Physician-Patient Trust: Integrating Theory and Research.

Linda Weber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Linda WeberDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Utica, USA. flrw@sunypoly.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trust is a critical dynamic in the physician-patient relationship, essential for achieving positive health outcomes. Drawing on Luhmann's systemic account of trust, Seligman's notion of familiarity as a bridging mechanism, and Weber and Carter's interactional-constructivist approach, this study proposes a theoretically grounded model of patient trust in physicians, one that aligns with existing empirical measures. Seven dimensions of trust were identified through theoretical-empirical mapping of the indicators in existing measurement tools: self-disclosure, communication competence, interpersonal competence, perspective-taking, fidelity, technical competence, and fairness. While self-disclosure and perspective-taking are present in the interactional model of trust, they are absent from the primary empirical measures of trust, highlighting important areas for further measurement development. This study draws on the established distinction between trust as a way of relating to a known autonomous moral agent and confidence in systems, with familiarity serving as a conceptual bridge through which system confidence can become interpersonal trust. By integrating foundational sociological theories with empirical dimensions using an abductive analytical approach, this study proposes a conceptual framework that is intended to guide future measurement development in the study of physician trust.

Indexed as

LuhmannMeasurementPhysicianSeligmanTheoryTrustWeber

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.