ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2026
Successful destination therapy after stepwise mechanical circulatory support in a patient with cardiogenic shock following mechanical aortic valve replacement.
Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with mechanical aortic valve replacement and end-stage heart failure present major challenges when mechanical circulatory support is required, as transvalvular devices such as the Impella 5.5 are contraindicated. We report a 57-year-old man with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who developed cardiogenic shock after prior mechanical aortic valve replacement. Despite cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator support and intra-aortic balloon pumping, he became dialysis dependent. The patient's condition progressively deteriorated, necessitating more robust mechanical circulatory support. Although durable left ventricular assist device implantation was considered, transvalvular Impella 5.5 support was precluded by the mechanical aortic valve, and simultaneous durable left ventricular assist device implantation with redo aortic valve replacement was considered high risk because of poor surgical tolerance and end-organ dysfunction. Therefore, we planned a staged surgical strategy. Reoperative aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve was therefore performed to enable Impella 5.5 implantation. Impella support resulted in hemodynamic stabilization, end-organ recovery, and improvement in risk stratification. Subsequently, a HeartMate 3 was successfully implanted as destination therapy. The patient recovered progressively and was discharged. This case demonstrates that intentional conversion to a bioprosthetic valve may be a viable strategy to enable advanced mechanical circulatory support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.