Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536228›Full record

ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2026

Successful destination therapy after stepwise mechanical circulatory support in a patient with cardiogenic shock following mechanical aortic valve replacement.

Rina Ebe, Tatsuki Fujiwara, Eiki Nagaoka, Takuya Kawabata, Hironobu Sakurai, Junya Nabeshima, Takuro Takashima, Taishi Yonetsu, Makoto Araki, Yoshitaka Isotani and 2 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rina EbeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Tatsuki FujiwaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Eiki NagaokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Takuya KawabataDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Hironobu SakuraiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Junya NabeshimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Takuro TakashimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Taishi YonetsuDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Makoto ArakiDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Yoshitaka IsotaniDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Tetsuo SasanoDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Tomoyuki FujitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan. tfujita.cvsg@tmd.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3023-5014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with mechanical aortic valve replacement and end-stage heart failure present major challenges when mechanical circulatory support is required, as transvalvular devices such as the Impella 5.5 are contraindicated. We report a 57-year-old man with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who developed cardiogenic shock after prior mechanical aortic valve replacement. Despite cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator support and intra-aortic balloon pumping, he became dialysis dependent. The patient's condition progressively deteriorated, necessitating more robust mechanical circulatory support. Although durable left ventricular assist device implantation was considered, transvalvular Impella 5.5 support was precluded by the mechanical aortic valve, and simultaneous durable left ventricular assist device implantation with redo aortic valve replacement was considered high risk because of poor surgical tolerance and end-organ dysfunction. Therefore, we planned a staged surgical strategy. Reoperative aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve was therefore performed to enable Impella 5.5 implantation. Impella support resulted in hemodynamic stabilization, end-organ recovery, and improvement in risk stratification. Subsequently, a HeartMate 3 was successfully implanted as destination therapy. The patient recovered progressively and was discharged. This case demonstrates that intentional conversion to a bioprosthetic valve may be a viable strategy to enable advanced mechanical circulatory support.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveHeart-Assist DevicesHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationShock, CardiogenicBioprosthesisCardiomyopathy, DilatedHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationTreatment OutcomeCardiogenic shockImpella 5.5Left ventricular assist deviceMechanical aortic valve replacementMechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID42536228
PMCPMC13427982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.