ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Early digital selection: machine learning and XAI approaches for predicting six-month body weight in hair goats.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of animals with high growth potential is essential for enhancing efficiency and sustainability in goat breeding systems. This study developed a machine learning-based predictive framework to estimate six-month live weight (LW2) using early-life phenotypic and environmental data from 52,938 Hair goat records collected between 2011 and 2024. Five models-Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost-were systematically compared within a robust pipeline incorporating Winsorization, group-based cross-validation, and hyperparameter optimization. XGBoost achieved the highest performance (R² = 0.842; MAE = 1.96 kg), reducing unexplained variance and prediction error by approximately 36% and 23%, respectively, compared to the linear baseline (R² = 0.753; MAE = 2.54 kg). The model demonstrated strong generalization capacity and a biologically consistent residual structure. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) analyses confirmed that weaning weight (LW1) is the primary predictor of LW2, serving as an integrated proxy for genetic potential and early developmental conditions. Notably, weaning age emerged as a nonlinear determinant of growth efficiency despite exhibiting a weak linear correlation, underscoring the advantage of tree-based ensembles in capturing maturation dynamics. A data-driven decision threshold (LW1 ≈ 21.7 kg), open to a plausible physiological interpretation, was identified, separating two groups with an approximate 9 kg difference in predicted weight. These findings demonstrate that routinely collected early-life data can be transformed into a reliable tool for early selection. The proposed Early Digital Selection framework facilitates proactive, data-driven breeding decisions at weaning, providing measurable improvements in prediction accuracy and resource allocation efficiency under heterogeneous field conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.