ReviewNeurosurgical review2026
Can stereotactic radiosurgery treat idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus? literature-based evidence.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a common and potentially reversible cause of gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence in the elderly, with current treatments relying primarily on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedures that are associated with notable complications and failure rates. The choroid plexus, as the principal site of CSF production, represents a biologically plausible therapeutic target. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a non-invasive approach for precise ablation of the central nervous system pathologies; however, its role in iNPH has not been systematically explored. This review examines the biological rationale, experimental evidence, and potential clinical applicability of radiosurgical ablation of the choroid plexus for iNPH, while identifying existing limitations and future research directions. Nonetheless, critical gaps remain, including an incomplete understanding of the mechanisms of action, the absence of dose-response data, a lack of standardized treatment protocols, and unknown clinical outcomes and adverse event profiles. Further preclinical studies, particularly in larger animal models, are required to refine dosimetry, clarify biological effects, and assess safety, ultimately informing the design of prospective clinical trials to determine the feasibility and efficacy of SRS as a potential non-invasive therapeutic option for iNPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536215What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.