Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536194›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Surgical outcomes and risk factors identification for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by pneumatic retinopexy using pure air.

Xin Zhang, Minye Wang, Tiepei Zhu, Shenchao Guo, Yuheng Zhan, Zhenyang Xiang, Gaochun Li, Enhui Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xin Zhang *Department of Ophthalmology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 318000, China.
Minye Wang *Department of Ophthalmology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 318000, China.
Tiepei ZhuEye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Shenchao GuoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 318000, China.
Yuheng ZhanTaizhou central hospital (Taizhou university hospital), Taizhou, 318000, China.
Zhenyang XiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 318000, China.
Gaochun LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 318000, China.
Enhui LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 318000, China. lieh@enzemed.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5916-9621

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82201197Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project 2024KY541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and identify risk factors for failure of pneumatic retinopexy (PR) using pure air.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 199 eyes from 199 patients with uncomplicated RRD who underwent PR at a single institution between 2019 and 2024. All patients were followed for at least 6 months, with specific follow-up intervals at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary outcome was the anatomical success rate. Statistical analyses, including univariate and multivariate logistic regression, were performed to identify preoperative risk factors for surgical failure. A machine learning model (Random Forest) was also developed to predict surgical success.

resultsThe single-operation anatomical success rate was 83.9% (167/199). Following repeated gas injection in select cases, the final success rate increased to 89.4% (178/199). Multivariate analysis identified younger age (< 50 years) (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.66; P < 0.05), the presence of a round hole (as opposed to a horseshoe tear) (OR 2.35; P < 0.05) as independent risk factors for primary PR failure. Additionally, lattice degeneration in the attached retina emerged as a potential risk factor with borderline statistical significance (OR 2.49, P = 0.046). A Random Forest model employed for predicting surgical success yielded favorable outcomes, with an accuracy of 0.88 and an AUC of 0.819.

conclusionPneumatic retinopexy using intravitreal air is an effective treatment for uncomplicated RRD, achieving high final anatomical success rates. However, surgeons should be aware of a higher risk of failure in younger patients and in eyes with round retinal holes or lattice degeneration in the attached retina. Machine learning models show promise for preoperatively predicting surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Gas tamponadeMachine learning modelPneumatic retinopexyRetinal breakRhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.