ArticleSurgery today2026
Medial vs. inferior approach in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparative study of the perioperative outcomes for early-career surgeons.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the safety of the medial and inferior approaches in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and assess their suitability for early career surgeons.
methodsIn this multicenter cohort study, 289 patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy at 21 institutions were analyzed using propensity score matching. The outcomes of the medial and inferior approaches were compared in the overall cohort and in cases performed by early career surgeons (≤ 12 postgraduate years).
resultsIn the overall cohort (medial, n = 119; inferior, n = 170), no significant differences were observed in the intraoperative or postoperative complication rates, operative time, or blood loss. Among early career surgeons (medial, n = 42; inferior, n = 99), the medial approach was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complications (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.93; p = 0.037) and a shorter operative time (β = -21.75 min, 95% CI -40.57 to -0.94; p = 0.040).
conclusionFor early career surgeons, the medial approach was associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications and a shorter operative time. These findings support the educational value of this technique and suggest that prioritizing it in early surgical training may enhance perioperative safety and inform surgical training curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.