Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536151›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Quantifying postural responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation for a four-electrode montage.

Gaurav N Pradhan, Sarah E Kingsbury, Jan Stepanek, Michael J Cevette

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gaurav N PradhanDepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Audiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. pradhan.gaurav@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-462X
Sarah E KingsburyDepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Audiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3411-242X
Jan StepanekAerospace Medicine and Vestibular Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5748-6150
Michael J CevetteDepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Audiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7746-1720

Funding

Defense Sciences Office, DARPA 140D0422C0053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standing balance is maintained through the integration of signals from the proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular systems. Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) delivered through head-worn electrodes is increasingly used in clinical vestibular rehabilitation and immersive entertainment interfaces, but it is known to impact on-feet postural stability. Prior studies assessing balance and postural effects have predominantly focused on bilateral mastoid-based uniaxial GVS paradigms. Limited research has characterized balance metrics under multiaxial GVS configurations using four-electrode montages generating multiple directional stimulation paradigms. Standing balance was assessed in healthy participants with eyes closed using a dual force-plate system to record center-of-pressure (COP) dynamics. Participants were exposed to six randomized GVS stimulation conditions across four electrodes placed on the left and right mastoids, center forehead, and nape of the neck, while static, dynamic sway, and velocity-based COP features were extracted to characterize postural responses. GVS significantly altered static, dynamic sway, and velocity-based balance measures compared with the Null condition across six stimulation paradigms. All GVS stimulations increased COP displacement, sway length, sway area, and peak velocities, while reducing sway density metrics across mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) axes. These findings provide an early quantitative characterization of postural responses to an unconventional GVS montage and create a foundation for predicting body motion during multiaxial vestibular stimulations. Such insights are important for the safe application of GVS in standing and ambulatory contexts, including clinical vestibular rehabilitation and immersive simulation environments.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationPostural BalanceVestibule, LabyrinthAdultElectrodesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBalanceDisplacementGalvanicSwayVelocityVestibular

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.