Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536145›Full record

ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2026

Bias in AI in Epic Electronic Medical Records and Its Impact on Executive Communication: Conceptual Analysis.

Naomi Pemberton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Naomi PembertonSchool of Health Sciences, Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow College of Health Professions, Central Michigan University, 1200 S Franklin St, Mount Pleasant, MI, United States, 1 917-701-4006.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9962-0757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: AI has become an essential component of modern health care delivery in Epic (Epic Systems Corporation) electronic medical record (EMR) systems, supporting predictive analytics, diagnostic decision-making, and population health management. Despite these advancements, evidence reveals that AI algorithms can perpetuate or even amplify existing health inequities through biased training data and flawed model design. Such algorithmic bias poses ethical challenges for health care leadership, regulatory compliance, and executive communication, especially in ensuring patient equity, transparency, and public accountability. Objective: This conceptual paper examines how algorithmic bias in Epic's AI modules influences executive decision-making, organizational communication, and trust within health care systems. It integrates organizational communication theory and public health informatics research to propose a framework for ethical, transparent, and equitable communication in AI-integrated health care settings. Methods: Drawing upon the ethical communication and algorithmic trust framework (ECATF), this paper synthesizes interdisciplinary literature on AI bias, data governance, and leadership communication. The framework explains how transparent executive communication creates stakeholder trust in the context of bias identification and regulatory oversight. Unlabelled: This conceptual analysis suggests that algorithmic bias influences leadership communication, equity framing, and governance strategies in AI-integrated health care systems. Incorporating AI bias auditing alongside regulatory monitoring and public education initiatives may support fairness, accountability, and health literacy across communities. Conclusions: As AI continues to shape health care leadership and policy, ongoing evaluation, ethical foresight, and regulatory vigilance are essential. Transparency, collaborative governance, and adaptive education will be necessary to ensure that AI supports equitable innovation rather than reinforcing unintended harm.

Indexed as

AIAI in health carealgorithmic biasEpic electronic medical recordsexecutive communicationhealth care

Identifiers

PMID42536145
PMCPMC13426118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.