ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Artificial intelligence in knee osteotomy: evolution of alignment assessment and surgical decision-making.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Embodied artificial intelligence in robotic orthopaedic surgery: from intelligent assistance to adaptive surgical autonomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knee osteotomy remains a fundamental joint-preserving intervention for unicompartmental osteoarthritis and lower limb malalignment, yet traditional two-dimensional planning is often limited by inter-observer variability and geometric imprecision. Over the past five years, artificial intelligence (AI) has transitioned from basic landmark detection into comprehensive surgical platforms encompassing automated alignment assessment, biomechanical simulation, and intraoperative navigation. This structured review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, evaluates the clinical integration of AI-driven reconstruction, biomechanical modeling, and prognostic algorithms. The results indicate that AI-driven workflows significantly enhance surgical precision; convolutional neural networks demonstrated mean absolute errors of less than 1.2 mm in landmark detection, while three-dimensional reconstructions achieved high anatomical fidelity with mechanical axis deviations averaging 0.52°±0.31°. Furthermore, biomechanical simulations utilizing recurrent neural networks proved substantially faster than traditional finite element analysis, and AI-enhanced robotic platforms achieved corrections within 1° of planned targets in over 95% of cases. Prognostic models reported ROC-AUC values up to 0.81, showing strong correlation with long-term joint survival. While statistical validation confirms high reproducibility across multicenter cohorts, the current literature is limited by a scarcity of prospective randomized controlled trials. In conclusion, AI in knee osteotomy has evolved into an essential tool for precision medicine, offering improved accuracy in patient-specific planning. Future research should prioritize explainable AI and digital twin platforms, alongside large-scale clinical trials, to definitively establish the impact of these technologies on long-term patient-reported outcomes and surgical success rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536128What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.