ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026
A QM/MM study on triplet decay of 6-thioguanine and 6-selenoguanine with explicit solvent.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextMotivated by their potential use as a photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy, we report an electrostatic embedding quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) study of 6-selenoguanine and 6-thioguanine in water. We analyzed triplet-state nonradiative decay within quasi-Marcus theory and assessed the influence of solvation by comparing QM/MM with previous microsolvation and PCM models. Both molecules follow similar deactivation pathways, involving torsional distortion around the chalcogen center and decay through a T₁/S₀ crossing point. Experimental studies show that triplet decay of 6-selenoguanine (6SeGua) is 835 times faster than 6-thioguanine (6tGua) in water. The shorter T₁ lifetime of 6SeGua is due to its higher spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and lower activation barrier to reach the T
methodAll molecular dynamics simulations of 6SeGua and 6tGua were performed using AMBER 2023 with GAFF2 and the TIP3P water model. Representative equilibrated structures were used for QM/MM calculations within the COBRAMM framework using electrostatic embedding. The QM region was treated using TD-DFT within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA) at the CAM-B3LYP/6-311G* level, with electronic structure calculations performed using Gaussian 16. T₁/S₀ crossing points were optimized using an in-house CIOpt program. Spin-orbit coupling (SOC) matrix elements were calculated using the PySOC program based on the Breit-Pauli spin-orbit Hamiltonian with the effective charge approximation. Nonradiative ISC rates were estimated using a quasi-Marcus approach, and noncovalent interactions were analyzed using QTAIM and IGMH methods with Multiwfn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.