Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535916›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Taming the reference genome jungle: the refget sequence collection standard.

Donald R Campbell, Timothee Cezard, Sveinung Gundersen, Andrew D Yates, Robert M Davies, John Marshall, Sang-Hoon Park, Alex H Wagner, Michael I Love, Reggan Thomas and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. GBZ-base and GAF-base: Indexed pangenome file formats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Donald R CampbellDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 22908, Charlottesville VA.
Timothee CezardEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Sveinung GundersenDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway.
Andrew D YatesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Robert M DaviesWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA,UK.
John MarshallCentre for Population Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Sang-Hoon ParkDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 22908, Charlottesville VA.
Alex H WagnerThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH USA.
Michael I LoveDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Reggan ThomasEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.
Oliver HofmannUniversity of Melbourne Collaborative Centre for Genomic Cancer Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nathan C SheffieldDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 22908, Charlottesville VA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationReference genomes are foundational to genomics but suffer from widespread ambiguity and incompatibility due to inconsistent naming, undocumented differences, and lack of formal mechanisms for comparison.

resultsTo address this, we introduce the GA4GH refget Sequence Collections (seqcol) standard. Refget seqcol is a framework for unambiguous representation, retrieval, and comparison of sequence collections such as reference genomes and transcriptomes. The seqcol standard comprises four components: a structured data schema, a canonical encoding algorithm that produces content-based, globally unique identifiers, a retrieval API, and a comparison protocol. This standard enables precise identification of sequence collections, even across decentralized or private systems, and allows compatibility assessments beyond exact identity, such as order-relaxed matches or shared coordinate systems. We applied the refget seqcol standard to 60 human and 36 mouse reference genomes sourced from major providers. Using digest-based comparisons, we quantified levels of similarity across attributes including sequence names, lengths, coordinate systems, and actual sequence content. Our analysis revealed some consistent subsets of sequences or coordinate systems, as well as substantial incompatibility among references and duplicate references under different names. This work offers a scalable, reproducible solution to the reference genome compatibility crisis, enabling improved transparency, reuse, and integration in genomic analyses. Refget seqcol enhances interoperability across tools and datasets, making genomic research more robust and reproducible. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: To support adoption of refget seqcol, we provide a Python package implementing the full standard, a web API, and a comparison interface allowing users to assess local references against a curated database. The formal specification is hosted at https://ga4gh.github.io/refget/ and the reference implementation can be found at https://github.com/refgenie/refget.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.