Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535903›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2026

Emotion regulation modulates subsequent control of unwanted memories.

Hui Xie, Xuanyi Lin, Jin-Xiao Zhang, Dandan Zhang, James J Gross, Xiaoqing Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui XieKey Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences, Ministry of Education; Institute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3941-4150
Xuanyi LinDepartment of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.
Jin-Xiao ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8794-1505
Dandan ZhangInstitute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610066, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1825-7114
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Xiaoqing HuDepartment of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8112-9700

Funding

General Research Fund 17614922Hong Kong Research Grants Council. H.X. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32400862Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2022ZD0214100Ministry of Science and Technology of China STI2030-Major ProjectsNational Natural Science Foundation of China 32171056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion regulation and memory control are indispensable for well-being, yet their interplay remains poorly understood. In this preregistered electroencephalogram (EEG) study, we investigated how emotion regulation influences the subsequent control of negative memories. Participants learned object-aversive scene pairings and were then instructed to either naturally watch or actively reappraise the aversive scenes. They subsequently completed an EEG-based Think/No-Think (TNT) task, where they either retrieved or suppressed the retrieval of aversive scenes in response to Think or No-Think object cues while reporting any intrusions they experienced. Different from our initial hypothesis, preregistered analyses showed that during retrieval suppression, reappraised memories were associated with larger centro-parietal P300 than watched scenes. Consistently, in the post-TNT recall test, participants recalled more details and reported lower negative emotions related to these reappraised scenes than the watched scenes. These results suggest that cognitive reappraisal may preserve the episodic content of negative memories while lessening their emotional impact during recall. This finding holds significant clinical potential, as it could enable individuals to retain valuable information from adverse experiences without being overwhelmed by distress. Additionally, it may help address reduced memory specificity in affective disorders, offering a promising avenue for therapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

BrainEmotional RegulationEmotionsMemoryMental RecallAdultCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPhotic StimulationThinkingYoung Adultemotion regulationevent-related potentialmemory controlThink/No-Thinkvoluntary forgetting

Identifiers

PMID42535903
PMCPMC13472688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.