Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535888›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology2026

Antifungal Management in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: From Primary Prophylaxis to Empirical and Diagnosis-Driven Treatment

Vildan Özkocaman, Tuğcan Alp Kırkızlar, Gökhan Metan, Ömrüm Uzun, İbrahim Ethem Pınar, Fahir Özkalemkaş, Muhlis Cem Ar, Murat Akova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vildan ÖzkocamanBursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-0014-7398
Tuğcan Alp KırkızlarTrakya University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Edirne, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-1361-6213
Gökhan MetanHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-2676-4557
Ömrüm UzunHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-4721-0139
İbrahim Ethem PınarBursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-9907-1498
Fahir ÖzkalemkaşBursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-9710-134X
Muhlis Cem Arİstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-0332-9253
Murat AkovaHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-6904-9473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with hematological malignancies, especially those undergoing intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This text provides a comprehensive risk-adapted framework for antifungal prophylaxis, stratifying patients into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk categories. Mold-active prophylaxis, primarily with posaconazole, is recommended for high-risk patients such as those with acute myeloid leukemia during remission induction or those with grade III-IV graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic HSCT. Fluconazole remains an option for yeast-active prophylaxis in intermediate-risk patients, while low-risk groups generally do not require prophylaxis. The evolving landscape of targeted therapies such as venetoclax, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy poses new challenges, particularly due to drug-drug interactions with triazole antifungals. In patients receiving venetoclax, azole co-administration necessitates significant dose adjustments. We also present algorithms for antifungal management in the context of CD19 CAR-T therapy and novel agents, emphasizing the role of individualized risk assessment. Beyond prophylaxis, timely diagnosis and early treatment of IFDs are critical. The role of thoracic computed tomography, serum and bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan, and fungal biomarkers is discussed within diagnostic-driven strategies. We outline treatment pathways for suspected pulmonary or sinus fungal infections, including when to escalate antifungal therapy or consider surgical intervention. This content offers a practical and evidence-based guide for clinicians navigating antifungal strategies in a rapidly changing therapeutic landscape, aiming to reduce IFD-related mortality while balancing toxicity, resistance, and healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsHematologic NeoplasmsMycosesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansAntifungal AgentsAntifungal prophylaxisCAR-T cell therapyCD19-directed therapiesHematological malignanciesInvasive fungal infectionsPosaconazoleRisk stratificationVenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID42535888
PMCPMC13540402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.