Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535825›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026

Umbilical Cord: A Non-Invasive DNA Source for Sea Turtle Genomics.

Gisela Marín-Capuz, Elena Abella, Marta Pascual, Cinta Pegueroles, Carlos Carreras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gisela Marín-CapuzDepartment de Genética, Microbiología y Estadística & IRBio, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-4685
Elena AbellaBETA Technological Center, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-7109
Marta PascualDepartment de Genética, Microbiología y Estadística & IRBio, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6189-0612
Cinta PeguerolesDepartment de Genética, Microbiología y Estadística & IRBio, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-9866
Carlos CarrerasDepartment de Genética, Microbiología y Estadística & IRBio, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-6445

Funding

European Union LIFE-TURTLENEST (LIFE21-NAT-IT LIFE TURTLENEST/101074584)'Fundación Biodiversidad', the 'Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico (MITECO)' in the context of the 'Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia (PRTR)', the European Union - NextGenerationEU InGeNi-CarettaMCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF/EU from the Spanish Government BlueDNA (PID2023-146307OB)MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the 'European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR' GenoMarTur (CNS2022-135205)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing has revolutionised conservation genomics by enabling genome-wide information even in non-model species. However, obtaining non-invasive samples for genomics remains challenging in species like sea turtles, which spend most of their lives in the open ocean. In addition, traditional sampling methods are often impractical or unsafe for hatchlings, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. We investigated the potential of umbilical cords (UCs), both from the proximal and distal regions, as a non-invasive sampling method. We assessed the suitability of UC sampling by evaluating prevalence under different incubation conditions, and whether the UC reflected a genetic origin from the mother or offspring. We analysed 76 samples with 2bRAD from five Spanish loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) emerging nests, including UCs from 13 hatchlings (both proximal and distal region), 48 hatchling blood samples (four with genotyped UCs) and blood from two breeding females. Using the Percentage of Shared Genotypes (PSG) analysis, we determined that the UC genotype from both sides matched the hatchling blood genotype (97.7%), while PSG were lower between related individuals (73.5%) and even lower between unrelated individuals (56.5%). UC prevalence varied by incubation type, appearing in 100% of artificially incubated nests in Spain, in 25% of Spain's naturally incubated nests, an emergent nesting population, and in only 4.5% of nests naturally incubated in Cape Verde, an established nesting population. Our findings establish UCs as a reliable non-invasive DNA source for hatchlings, particularly in incubator-hatched eggs. This approach advances genomic analysis while minimising disturbance, offering insights into population genetics and conservation strategies.

Indexed as

DNAGenomicsTurtlesUmbilical CordAnimalsFemaleGenotypeSpainDNACaretta carettagenomicsnon‐invasive samplingsea turtleumbilical cord

Identifiers

PMID42535825
PMCPMC13426248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.