ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Umbilical Cord: A Non-Invasive DNA Source for Sea Turtle Genomics.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing has revolutionised conservation genomics by enabling genome-wide information even in non-model species. However, obtaining non-invasive samples for genomics remains challenging in species like sea turtles, which spend most of their lives in the open ocean. In addition, traditional sampling methods are often impractical or unsafe for hatchlings, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. We investigated the potential of umbilical cords (UCs), both from the proximal and distal regions, as a non-invasive sampling method. We assessed the suitability of UC sampling by evaluating prevalence under different incubation conditions, and whether the UC reflected a genetic origin from the mother or offspring. We analysed 76 samples with 2bRAD from five Spanish loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) emerging nests, including UCs from 13 hatchlings (both proximal and distal region), 48 hatchling blood samples (four with genotyped UCs) and blood from two breeding females. Using the Percentage of Shared Genotypes (PSG) analysis, we determined that the UC genotype from both sides matched the hatchling blood genotype (97.7%), while PSG were lower between related individuals (73.5%) and even lower between unrelated individuals (56.5%). UC prevalence varied by incubation type, appearing in 100% of artificially incubated nests in Spain, in 25% of Spain's naturally incubated nests, an emergent nesting population, and in only 4.5% of nests naturally incubated in Cape Verde, an established nesting population. Our findings establish UCs as a reliable non-invasive DNA source for hatchlings, particularly in incubator-hatched eggs. This approach advances genomic analysis while minimising disturbance, offering insights into population genetics and conservation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.