Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535818›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2026

Current landscape of pediatric optic neuritis management in India: A clinical practice survey.

Adeline S Lasrado, Ramesh Kekunnaya, Snehal Ganatra, Virender Sachdeva

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adeline S LasradoDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus and Neuro-Ophthalmology, Jasti V Ramanamma Children's Eye Care Centre, Child Sight Institute & Eye and Brain Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ramesh KekunnayaDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus and Neuro-Ophthalmology, Jasti V Ramanamma Children's Eye Care Centre, Child Sight Institute & Eye and Brain Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Snehal GanatraDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus and Neuro-Ophthalmology, Nimmagadda Prasad Children's Eye Care Centre, Child Sight Institute, L V Prasad Eye Institute, GMR Varalakshmi Campus, Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Virender SachdevaDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus and Neuro-Ophthalmology, Nimmagadda Prasad Children's Eye Care Centre, Child Sight Institute, L V Prasad Eye Institute, GMR Varalakshmi Campus, Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo understand the practice patterns in the management of pediatric optic neuritis in India and detect the gaps in evaluation and management.

methodsAn online survey-based study questionnaire was shared among ophthalmologists in the last quarter of 2024. The questionnaire included questions pertaining to the clinical experience, evaluation, and management of optic neuritis in children.

resultsSeventy ophthalmologists across India participated in the survey. Of these, 45% had a formal neuro-ophthalmology training and 42% had more than 5 years of experience in managing pediatric optic neuritis. Most respondents managed under less than five cases every month. Participants with under 5 years' clinical experience reported higher rates of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease and post-infectious ON followed by neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, multiple sclerosis, and chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuritis. Visual fields (50%) and optical coherence tomography (45%) were frequently requested ocular investigations. Magnetic resonance imaging brain and spine with contrast and fat-suppressed sequence was recommended by 23% of respondents, serological workup in 91%, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis in 17%. For treatment, intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) was used by 94% for 3 days (45%) or 5 days (53%). 34% ophthalmologists advised IVMP dosing at 30 mg/kg. In recurrent cases, those with less than 5 years' experience more often repeated neuroimaging ( P = 0.050) and initiated IVMP irrespective of vision ( P = 0.046).

conclusionsThis survey highlights the variability in diagnostic testing and management practices of pediatric optic neuritis among ophthalmologists in India underscoring the need for developing, guiding, and following standardized practice guidelines.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementOphthalmologistsOptic NeuritisPractice Patterns, Physicians'ChildFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansIndiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTomography, Optical CoherenceGlucocorticoidsNeuro-ophthalmologistsophthalmologistspediatric optic neuritispractice patternssurvey

Identifiers

PMID42535818
PMCPMC13485076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.