ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Multimodal imaging in neuro-ophthalmology.
Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodal imaging has become a vital pillar in modern ophthalmology. Initially this was restricted to retinal diagnostics but now this approach is central even to neuro-ophthalmology, where the retina and optic nerve offer an accessible window to the central nervous system. Multimodal refers to the strategic combination of diverse imaging tools to gather complementary structural, functional, and vascular information, ultimately improving diagnostic precision. In Neuro-Ophthalmology, we draw upon a wide spectrum of multimodal imaging techniques, spanning both ocular and non-ocular investigations. Ocular imaging can be broadly categorized into non-invasive and invasive modalities. Non-invasive modalities include fundus photography, scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, fundus autofluorescence, laser speckle flowgraphy, Humphrey field analyzer, electrophysiological tests, ocular ultrasonography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography. Invasive imaging involves fundus fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography. Non-ocular imaging encompasses Doppler studies, computerized tomography (CT) scans, CT angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with venography or angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Each is presented through a common framework of principle, clinical use, comparative utility, and limitations, followed by a practical, syndrome-based scheme for selecting tests and escalating to neuroimaging when red flags arise. With these technological advances, we now have access to an extensive arsenal of ocular and non-ocular modalities that complement each other to refine diagnosis and management. However, when not used judiciously, these tools can be unnecessary and cost-inefficient. Therefore, understanding which test is most appropriate in a given clinical scenario is crucial for maximizing their value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.