Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535656›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2026

Neural Assimilation and Accommodation in Trilinguals: An fMRI Study at 7 T.

Dinh Ha Duy Thuy, Naoya Oishi, Thai Akasaka, Tomohisa Okada, Takashi Hanakawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dinh Ha Duy ThuyHuman Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8408-4269
Naoya OishiHuman Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-3381
Thai AkasakaHuman Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohisa OkadaHuman Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-5677
Takashi HanakawaHuman Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3267-8214

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP23wm0625001Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K00687Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K10808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how multiple languages are represented in the multilingual brain is critical to theories of multilingual assimilation and accommodation. Whether a second language (L2) recruits native-like networks (assimilation) or engages additional neural resources (accommodation) depends partly on the linguistic distance between L1 and L2. However, it remains unclear whether multilinguals can flexibly modulate assimilation and accommodation mechanisms when dealing with different L2 systems. Using 7 T-fMRI, we investigated brain activation patterns during a covert picture-naming task involving one-back phonological retrieval in 15 native Chinese speakers highly proficient in Japanese and English. Whole-brain univariate analysis revealed a common fronto-parieto-occipital network across all three languages (Chinese, Japanese, and English), supporting a shared core language system. However, the Japanese task elicited greater activation in the left lingual and middle occipital gyri, suggesting increased implicit visual-lexical demands. Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) showed greater pattern similarity between Chinese and English than between Chinese and Japanese, indicating differential neural representation across L2 languages. VOI-based RSA showed a trend toward correlations between Japanese proficiency and representational similarity in the executive regions (pars triangularis and anterior cingulate gyrus), although these correlations did not reach statistical significance. These findings demonstrated that the trilingual brain relied on both assimilation and accommodation, with the level of each modulated by differences in linguistic structure and language experience. Language with a distinct writing system (English) seemed to be assimilated into the dominant L1 Chinese neural framework, whereas orthographically related language (Japanese) rather drove neural accommodation, probably due to script-driven interference. This study highlighted multi-level neural adaptation processes underlying multilingual lexical processing and provided a neurocognitive basis for tailor-made educational strategies considering each student's linguistic background.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingMultilingualismPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultaccommodationassimilationfMRIlinguistic distancemultilingualismrepresentational similarity analysis (RSA)

Identifiers

PMID42535656
PMCPMC13426019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.